Associated Press | HealthyCal
 

Associated Press

  

Clinics unite to better serve low-income patients

Photo: Alex E. Proimos/Flickr

Southside Coalition paving way for better communication, better care among health clinics in South L.A

By Robert Fulton
California Health Report

It is 9 a.m. on a Tuesday and the St. John’s Well Child & Family Wellness Center in South Los Angeles is busy. More than 40 adults and children sit in the clinic’s large waiting area while the sounds of friendly conversations in Spanish and English, ringing cell phones and fussing youngsters fill the air.

In the middle of this, Olivia Mendez stands and begins to speak, first in Spanish, then in English, her voice rising above the buzz while her partner Evelia Castaneda hands out literature.

Mendez and Castaneda are Promotoras de Salud, or community health workers, employed by the Southside Coalition of Community Health Centers, a consortia of eight community health clinics based in the greater South Los Angeles area. The nonprofit Southside Coalition was established nine years ago as a way for a small number of clinics located in a limited geographic area with common traits to better coordinate services, improve access to both primary and specialty care, and present a united voice when it comes resource allocation, workforce development and communicating with their members in the community.

“The community health workers are a beautiful example of how we can collaborate,” said Dr. Felix Aguilar, CEO and President at UMMA Community Clinic and former Chief Medical Officer at the South Central Family Health Center, both coalition members.

Mendez and Castaneda’s task that Tuesday morning at St. John’s was to inform the community about health care reform, something they’ve done for the last two years and one of the coalition’s priorities. The duo visits one or two clinics a day, handing out information about health care reform while answering questions.

“We talk about everything,” Mendez said. “Our goal is to reach more people.”

East Los Angeles resident Jonatan De Leon approached Mendez with a question while waiting for a family member at St. John’s. De Leon, 24, said he’s been a legal resident for four years and wanted to know in what ways health care reform would benefit him. Mendez explained that while he will enjoy some benefits, additional benefits take effect following five years of legal residency. Mendez added that one of the more common questions she receives from the community is how will health care reform impact undocumented residents.

Edgard Augusto Jimeno, 33, didn’t know if he qualified for health insurance because he lacks income, so he took a brochure titled “Health Reform: Seven Things You Need to Know.” The Inglewood resident admits he might not pursue the matter further.

“I don’t know if I’m ever going to call the numbers and all that,” Jimeno said. “It seems like it’s a lot of work, but I might be wrong.”

While the Promotoras are a prime example of the Southside Coalition’s effectiveness in working as a unit, the collaboration is not limited to community outreach. The eight clinics have made concerted efforts establishing an internal referral system and sharing specialty care. St. John’s now employs a podiatrist that coalition members may refer patients to, and the To Help Everyone (T.H.E.) Clinic secured a retinal camera through the coalition’s efforts. Eisner Pediatric and Family Medical Center boasts a strong prenatal practice and does most of the deliveries for coalition patients at California Hospital Medical Center. Any of the clinics within the coalition can refer expectant mothers to Eisner.

The Southside Coalition has also made strides in care coordination. A pilot program at St. Francis Medical Center features a care coordinator on site. When a coalition patient enters the emergency department at St. Francis, the care coordinator makes sure that the patient seeks follow ups with his or her primary care provider. This improves continuity between hospital-based and primary care, and reduces emergency services utilization through education.

“I foresee that our coalition will continue to do more to bring us together, to enhance services for patients, to provide for greater collaboration, and also to connect the patients better with services,” Dr. Aguilar said.

The eight federally qualified health centers of the Southside Coalition are Central City Community Health Center, Eisner Pediatric & Family Medical Center, St. John’s Well Child & Family Center, South Bay Family Health Care, South Central Family Health Center, T.H.E. Clinic, UMMA Community Clinic and the Watts Healthcare Corporation. All coalition members are located in the County of Los Angeles Public Health Department’s Service Planning Area 6, the community of Lennox, or the city of Hawthorne; or receive at least 60 percent of their patients from those areas.

The Southside Coalition first formed in 2004, hired Nina Vaccaro as its executive director in 2006, and received 501(c)(3) status in 2007. Vaccaro reports to a Board of Director comprised of the CEOs of the eight participating clinics.

“Politically I think one unified voice is heard a lot louder than eight small voices,” Vaccaro said. “On the other end of that, it’s not just political. It’s looking at how do we actually improve care, and we really do a better job of that if we’re working together and sharing best practices, looking at programs and services that maybe one agency is doing really well.

“It was just kind of every man to himself, and (they) found they were competing for the same resources, competing for the same doctors and grants and patients,” Vaccaro added. “It didn’t make sense for them to compete with one another. It really made more sense for them to collaborate.”

Dr. Tracy Robinson, Chief Medical Officer at T.H.E., is quick to credit Vaccaro’s leadership as one of the reasons for the coalition’s success. “She’s very effective at communicating,” Dr. Robinson said.

The members of the Southside Coalition also belong to the Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County. Fifty clinics spread out over the geographic expanse that is L.A. County make up the CCALAC, and Vaccaro stresses that the Southside is not in competition with CCLAC, but is instead a way for clinics with things in common to focus on their needs and challenges as a group.

According to Vaccaro, when the coalition was first established, the idea of referring and sharing patients made some in leadership nervous.

“Initially, we actually had a lot of conversations about what does it mean if I’m sending my patient over to your clinic,” Vaccaro said. “Do I trust that you’re going to send them back? We had some conversations initially with the administrators, and that was something they were really concerned about.”

According to Vaccaro, the medical providers assured administration that they had built relationships with patients, bonds not easily broken.

“We recognize that the benefits of collaboration outweigh the benefits of competition,” Dr. Aguilar said. “We emphasize through our community clinics a trust that they will send the patients back. Otherwise the system cannot work.”

Dr. Robinson of T.H.E. had a more pragmatic approach to the whole topic of referring patients.

“If a patient goes to another clinic because they have something there that we don’t have in our clinic, the patient is getting care,” Dr. Robinson said. That, he added, is a precious commodity for an underserved population.

 

Slum housing still a health problem

By Chris Richard
California Health Report

Fifteen years ago, Los Angeles city officials reformed building inspections to crack down on slumlords, launching the nation’s first regular, building-by-building, room-by-room checks to make sure apartments met health and safety standards.

That was no mere bureaucratic adjustment. Before, the municipal Building and Safety Department checked up on a landlord only after receiving a complaint, an approach that drew criticism for overlooking abuses. Under the city Department of Housing’s “Systematic Code Enforcement Program” every one of LA’s 120,000 apartment buildings is inspected at least once every four years.

When the regular inspections started, officials identified 150,000 apartment units that failed to meet health codes. Today, the official count is a fraction of that, some 3,400.

Health activists say the dramatic statistical change could too easily lead to complacency. They’re calling for a new push focusing on allergens such as black mold and cockroach waste that they hold partially to blame for high asthma rates among children in some of the city’s poorest neighborhoods.

“We know that we have direct control over the indoor triggers that cause asthma and that are making our children sick,” said Jim Mangia, president of St. John Well Child & Family Center.

Mangia said St. John’s doctors must extract cockroaches from the infected ears of half a dozen children a week, and have no choice but to send them home to vermin-infested apartments where they face renewed attacks.

“What we need is more inspectors, what we need is more enforcement, and what we need is for inspectors to be educated about the ways that landlords will cover things up,” he said.

Mangia spoke at a recent press conference sponsored by the Asthma Coalition of Los Angeles County – to which St. John’s belongs – calling attention to the links between what they called poorly maintained slum housing and asthma.

According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, just over 11 percent of the county’s adult residents and a little more than 14 percent of its children have asthma. But those are averages; in most neighborhoods, the asthma rate is from 5 to 8 percent. It’s considerably lower to the west and north, and much higher in the center city and South Los Angeles.

In one Asthma Coalition report, 28 percent of the children living in South Los Angeles’ Figueroa Corridor who were treated by St. John’s had chronic asthma. A survey by another Asthma Coalition organization found asthma rates of 24 percent for the population as a whole in the same neighborhood.

Last year, research by the University of Southern California identified a direct link between proximity to a heavy traffic and the prevalence of childhood asthma. Those findings have started to inform the discussion over air quality regulations. But two years ago, a Columbia University found a correlation as well between exposure to cockroach waste and dust mites and higher asthma rates among children. And activists say they haven’t seen a corresponding toughening of housing inspection rules to address that risk.

Activists and tenants say it’s too easy for slumlords to neglect basic maintenance.

At the Figueroa Corridor building where the recent Asthma Coalition event was held, tenant Gabriel Martinez said he repeatedly asked the building’s owner to repair a leak in the plumbing above his kitchen ceiling, but the problem went uncorrected for months. Martinez suspects the relentless moisture, which soaked a living room carpet, contributed to his three-year-old daughter Dana’s asthma.

“Everything seemed OK when we moved in, but when it comes to fixing problems, they’re not very good here,” Martinez said.

In response to complaints from Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, or SAJE, regarding Martinez’ building, Los Angeles County Public Health investigators alleged 22 violations of county housing laws during an April 24 inspection. The listed problems included mold contamination and cockroach infestation, said Gary Hirschtick, chief environmental health specialist for the health department’s mid-city district.

An inspector can order a landlord to remove the infestation or remove mold and its source, but can’t direct how that is to be done, Hirshtick said. Typically, a property owner will call in a pest-control company to fumigate against cockroaches.

As for moldy walls, “If we saw them painting over mold, we wouldn’t allow that. But after the fact, it’s kind of hard to determine how it was corrected,” Hirshtick said.

Greg Spiegel, public policy director at the Inner City Law Center, wants to see officials giving much more specific direction.

“If it was about the building structure, where the second floor wasn’t adequately supported, you wouldn’t say, ‘Just fix it however you want to,’” he said. “You’d require a certain kind of beam. You’d use the building code.”

As for vermin, he likened spraying poison along baseboards to kill roaches to “hitting them with a hammer. We know from 30 years of research that that only kills the cockroaches it hits or who come along while it’s still fresh. The cockroaches walk around it.”

Instead, Spiegel advocates removing food and water sources – covering trash cans and fixing broken plumbing – then sealing cracks in apartment walls. Using gel baits, which the cockroaches take back to their nests, eliminates infestations at their source, Spiegel said. Activists say they’re determined to ensure that’s what happens in the building where Martinez and his family live.

A Los Angeles city housing department official inspected the building on the day of the Asthma Coalition event, responding to tenant complaints about mold and vermin. The official took photographs, but further results of that inspection are not yet available in the city’s online database.

Paulina Gonzalez, SAJE executive director, said last September, in order to meet a city building inspection, the owner of the 14-unit building fumigated against cockroaches, repainted some walls and removed moldy carpet.

But she said some building walls continued to feel damp to the touch after the work was completed, a common indication that there may be corroded, leaking pipes inside. In such cases, cockroaches typically return after a temporary retreat, Gonzalez said.

Beverly Hills resident Joseph Heffesse, the building’s owner, did not respond to a request for an interview left with his office on May 7. On May 10, a woman who answered the telephone at his office said that Heffesse and his wife Sandra, who is listed on county records as the building manager, would not grant an interview.

Nancy Halpern Ibrahim, executive director of the nonprofit Esperanza Community Housing Corp., an Asthma Coalition member, acknowledged that this building didn’t approach the level of horrific neglect by other property owners that has occasionally sparked political denunciations and official crackdowns.

City records show that this property has cleared some 20 official visits since September 2005. City “systematic” inspections in December 2007 and September 2012 both noted unnamed violations and ordered remediation, which the landlord performed, records show.

But in April, when health activists investigated tenant complaints, they found sufficient evidence in a single day to support ten complaints, Ibrahim noted. Those were the same complaints investigated in the May 7 Housing Department inspection.

“County environmental health does some inspections, the Housing Department does others and Building and Safety is responsible for another kind,” she said. “And what we’re saying is that this is a fractured system.

“There’s a lot of ‘Well, that’s another agency’s responsibility.’”

Spiegel of the Inner City Law Center points to state Health and Safety Code section 17920.3, which describes vermin infestations “as determined by a health officer.”

Housing Department inspectors, not being officially designated as health officers, interpret this as meaning they can’t identify infestations and order them removed, Spiegel said. He says for the public good, they need that authority.

Finally, Spiegel envisions the city and county agencies collaborating on building-by-building problems. He said county inspectors, who check each building yearly, lack the time for follow-through.

“I could see a system where the county’s kind of doing triage, and if think a building’s dangerous, referring it to the city for a more full inspection,” Spiegel said.

“But right now, they don’t coordinate at all.”

 

Long term care: a scary abyss

By Matt Perry

The exploding number of older adults in the United States – over 8,000 people turn 65 each day according to the U.S. Census Bureau – means Baby Boomers are staring into a terrifying abyss as a faltering economy wreaks havoc with retirement funds and the ability to pay for long-term care.

In an admission of defeat, the Obama administration threw up its hands long before January 1st when Congress officially scuttled plans for a new, voluntary long-term care insurance program, once part of the Affordable Care Act.

Replacing the aborted plan is a new 15-member commission of blue chip appointees representing nursing homes, labor, consultants, healthcare executives, and other experts.

After a lengthy delay – no budget was originally prescribed to help fund the meetings – the committee will finally meet on June 27.

Its goal: help devise a long-term care system that covers a fast-growing populace through ever-expanding life spans. All with dwindling resources.

In other words: Mission Impossible.

The shocking lack of preparation by Californians for long-term care was acutely revealed last September when The SCAN Foundation* reported that almost half of California voters 40 and over anticipated needing some type of long-term support for a family member within the next five years. Of that number, almost half said they couldn’t pay for even a single month of nursing home care; 73% said they couldn’t pay for over three months.

Today, there are currently eight million people nationwide with long-term care insurance policies. Yet even these may be insufficient.

Buyers who purchased plans back in the 1970’s and 1980’s sometimes found it difficult to extract benefits because of strict limitations.

“The original long-term policies really only covered nursing home care,” says Dr. Bruce Chernof, president and CEO of the SCAN Foundation, which funds research on long-term care solutions. “For somebody in our generations, that’s not what we’re looking for.”

Chernof will chair the new commission.

Today, nursing homes are only one small slice of a complex and expensive pie for long-term care costs that are increasingly focused on non-medical needs: preparing food, transportation to medical appointments, and other basic livings needs like cleaning and bathing. Family members often must dress wounds, empty colostomy bags, and administer drugs – including injections.

Besides nursing homes and in-home care, long-term care also spans assisted living and continuing care facilities.

The typical insurance buyer has also changed dramatically, says Bonnie Burns a policy consultant for the California Healthcare Advocates. Buyers in the 1990’s were often retirees in their 60’s – 70’s with moderate assets, she says. Today, those buyers have been blown out of the market by a faltering economy, replaced by wealthy middle-agers aiming to protect their much higher assets.

“This is a very different marketplace than it was 20 years ago,” says Burns.

While a dwindling number of insurers offer long-term care insurance – Prudential left the national market last year, and MetLife stopped writing new California policies in 2010 – those still remaining often demand nearly perfect physical and mental health.

“The underwriting requirements are so strict that the people who are likely to need it, can’t get it,” says Larry Minnix, president and CEO of LeadingAge, a national aging advocacy organization. “It’s now become a silk stocking product for people who can afford it and can get it.”

The cycle is a vicious one. Cash-strapped consumers buy fewer policies, which means greater risk for insurance companies, who must then hike premiums…. scaring off new buyers.

California’s largest public purchaser of health benefits – CalPERS – stopped taking new applications for long-term care insurance in 2009. Then, in a controversial vote last October, the CalPERS board approved an 85% premium hike starting in 2015 to bolster the struggling insurance program. (CalPERS may re-open its application process by the end of this year.)

Currently about 40 companies offer this insurance in California. But Nettie Hoge, chief deputy commissioner at the state’s Department of Insurance, says fewer than 20 are “actively selling.”

“A lot of the large insurers are not finding this a sustainable market,” says Chernof.

Why is long-term care insurance so critical when most citizens assume Medicare will cover them once they turn 65?

It won’t.

Medicare covers patients only for 100 days, providing that coverage only when older adults qualify for highly skilled care.

After that, patients pay for long-term care themselves. With nursing home costs averaging $6,800 a month or more than $80,000 a year – a figure that could double in the next 20 years – the coming need for long-term care insurance is overwhelming.

Increasingly, California residents are using up savings on long-term care until they are so destitute they qualify for Medi-Cal – the state’s equivalent of Medicaid.

And this “spend down” is precisely what worries state and federal officials: bankruptcy for these programs serving the poor.

How can long-term care insurance be saved?

“The way do to that is to create a much larger, broader market pool that allows you to spread more risk,” says Chernof.

Some are skeptical about the commission’s success.

“It’s going to be a real challenge for this group to accomplish very much,” says Howard Gleckman, a long-term care expert and author of the book “Caring for Our Parents.”

Gleckman notes the commission only meets for 6 months, and is filled with widely divergent interests that could spell trouble for consensus. Included are the head of the nation’s largest trade group representing nursing homes, and the president of the labor-backed United Long-Term Care Workers Union, part of SEIU – the Service Employees International United.

“There’s no agenda, there’s no real structure to this,” says Gleckman. “This is the more typical congressional hearing that won’t accomplish very much.”

Chernof – appointed to the commission by House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi – references a handful of states that have attained success in the long-term care market, most notably Maine, which has signed up a whopping 30% of adults 40 and over.

The top five states nationwide average 15% insured, according to a 2011 report co-authored by the Long Beach-based SCAN with the Commonwealth Fund and AARP.

California tallies just 4.3% — 24th in the nation.

That figure frightens aging experts who anticipate the state’s population 65 and over will double to 8 million in the next 20 years.

“We have a long way to go,” says Chernof.

Gleckman suggests the new committee look overseas for solutions.

“Every major developed country in the world except for the U.S. and Britain have moved to a (federally-supervised) social insurance system,” says Gleckman. “But everyone’s done it a little differently to reflect the cultures of their counties.”

France offers a cash benefit that can be used as recipients decide – which includes paying relatives for in-home care. Japan pays long-term care providers directly. Germany blends the two systems.

Gleckman cites Germany as the best potential model for America with its 2% payroll tax.

“It made their equivalent costs of Medicaid go down considerably,” agrees Minnix.

“The Germans don’t think of the payroll tax as a tax,” adds Gleckman. “They look at is as a contribution.” Workers must participate, and 90% purchase government insurance rather than private plans. Benefits are reviewed every five years.

Still, Gleckman says any politician here suggesting a 2% payroll tax “would get run out of office.”

He suggests another possible template for long-term care insurance would be the Medicare Part D voluntary prescription drug program.

At his most optimistic, Gleckman hopes the commission will “deliver a bi-partisan statement that this is a really serious problem that needs to be fixed.”

Official documents state the commission has just six months to produce a “comprehensive and detailed” report.

Chenof says the future for long-term care is grim “if we don’t put into place something fairly substantial within the next five years.”

He hopes the committee can deliver.

“The commission will bring together some of the best thinking we have.”

Perry wrote this article as part of the MetLife Foundation Journalists in Aging Fellows program, a collaboration of New America Media and the Gerontological Society of America.

Note: The SCAN Foundation is a sponsor of healthycal.org

 

Acupuncturists expect surge in patients under Obamacare

Licensed acupuncturist Cary Friedman discusses Obamacare in his Santa Cruz office. Photo: Genevieve Bookwalter/California Health Report

By Genevieve Bookwalter
California Health Report

Students at Five Branches University in Santa Cruz signed petitions and wrote letters to Sacramento last year in hopes that acupuncture, one of their areas of study, would be covered under new state and federal health care reform laws.

They got their wish. Last fall, California listed acupuncture as a benefit that insurers must include in new plans when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known informally as Obamacare, takes effect Jan. 1. Under the new rules, nearly everyone in the nation will be required to carry insurance or face a penalty. Federal subsidies will help pay premiums for individuals making up to $45,960 per year.

For acupuncture student Marta Vaisberg Correll, the decision gave her hope about building a practice in the spring, when she expects to earn her license. If insurance will help pay patients’ costs, Correll said, more of them are likely to take advantage of acupuncture.

“I think it legitimizes the medicine. A lot of people don’t know what (acupuncture) is; they think it’s this new-agey, voodoo kind of stuff,” Correll said. Seeing it listed as a mandatory benefit under health care reform, she said, validates its effectiveness.

Acupuncture joins tobacco cessation, vision screening and other benefits that insurers must cover for patients under new plans, beginning in 2014 (existing plans that do not cover acupuncture can be grandfathered in). While some providers already pay toward these services, not all do.

The law, authored in bills by then-Assemblyman Bill Monning, D-Carmel, and state Sen. Ed Hernandez, D-West Covina, laid out “essential health benefits,” or those that must be covered under plans offered in California on the open market under Obamacare.

Under Obamacare, insurers cannot charge patients more for private insurance — that not provided by an employer or public agency — because they are sick or have a pre-existing condition like diabetes, for example. Right now, plans usually cost more for those who are not in perfect health. For many, that price difference can put health insurance outside their reach.

Prices under the new law can vary based on age or where a patient lives.

The first plans offered in California under Obamacare were detailed last week, with a middle-of-the-road plan for an average 40-year-old estimated to cost about $300 per month.

Monning authored the Assembly’s version of the bill before he was elected to the state senate in November. He said the essential health benefits are crucial so consumers know what they will pay for when shopping for a policy.

“It is important for California to establish its Essential Health Benefits because it will level the playing field to allow Californians to make ‘apples to apples’ comparisons about health care coverage based on price and quality,” Monning said.

In other words, Monning said, consumers can comparison-shop and know that a “silver” plan offered by Kaiser and a silver plan offered by Anthem Blue Cross will contain the same mandated benefits.

As a result of Obamacare, health clinics and doctors’ offices nationwide are preparing for a wave of newly insured patients seeking preventative care or finally treating a longstanding problem when the new plans begin Jan. 1. Many are beefing up medical staff and administrative workers in anticipation of higher demand and more paperwork.

Licensed acupuncturist Cary Friedman said he also expects to see more newly covered patients. But health care reform could mean he earns less for his services per patient, he said, as insurance companies reimburse at a rate lower than what he now charges to cover Santa Cruz’s high cost of living.

For example, Friedman said, patients now typically pay $90 for the first appointment and $75 for appointments thereafter. Each appointment lasts 90 minutes.

Comparatively, he said, he expects insurance to pay him about $50 per session for the same treatment, with $25 coming from the patients’ co-pay.

“There will probably be a spot where I say, ‘I can’t take any more insurance people,’” Friedman said, and fills remaining spots with patients paying cash for services above what insurance will cover. While insurance is expected to pay for acupuncture to treat pain, for example, it might not cover treatment for anxiety, insomnia or digestive disorders, he said.

However, Friedman said, expanding coverage to include acupuncture will be a boon for consumers. That’s because acupuncture treatments typically requires multiple visits over a number of weeks. For cash-paying customers, the cost quickly can add up. A $25 weekly co-pay is a lot easier for many patients to stomach than a $90 weekly bill, he said.

“It’s frustrating when you have to charge a certain amount for your living, and you miss a large chunk of the population” that can’t afford it, Friedman said.

Friedman also expects a surge in paperwork, but said new electronic filing systems make claims relatively easy to handle. He does not have a support staff, he said, and doesn’t plan to hire one.

Correll said health care reform could help shape how she practices acupuncture. While she plans to start as a generalist, Correll said she finds that patients with chronic pain or sports injuries are less hesitant to see an acupuncturist. In addition, she said, more doctors are recommending acupuncture to treat those conditions, and insurance already is more likely to cover it.

“Right now most insurance companies will cover for that type of thing,” Correll said. “Infertility, digestive, insomnia, the good (insurance plans) will cover it but not all of them do.”

Correll also hopes more patients will have an opportunity to try treatments outside mainstream Western medicine.

“If it’s going to cost them less, they’ll be a lot more agreeable to it,” Correll said. “Doctors charge a lot, too, but your insurance covers it and you’re not going to see your doctor every week.”

 

The Power of Validation

Why Naomi Feil’s Validation Method Matters More Than Ever

By Dave Singleton

The term “validation” means a lot of things to a lot of people. For Naomi Feil, who founded and developed the Validation method in 1982 as a method for communicating with very old people who have certain forms of dementia, it has three distinct elements:

A basic, empathetic attitude

Principles that guide our actions and words

Nonverbal techniques that we use to communicate

In simple terms, it’s a way to move beyond initial conversations so you defuse confused interactions and get to the heart of the matter.

Recently I contacted Feil and her daughter, Validation master teacher Vicki de Klerk, who’s worked with her mother for almost 30 years, to learn more.

One thing is clear: These two women, who’ve coauthored books on the method, don’t like to use the word “therapy.” “Therapy connotes healing, and Validation does not heal people in the sense that they ‘get better,’” says de Klerk. “Very old people who are maloriented and disoriented respond to Validation because practitioners accept them as they are and do not try to change them. We explore their feelings and needs without judgment. Painful feelings that have been pushed down often need to be expressed, and we listen with empathy. They feel heard and valued. They keep communicating.”

Adds Feil, “Often after Validation, the old person becomes more verbal and interacts with others, especially in a Validation group.”

While some critics don’t like the concept because they see it as a form of lying, Feil and de Klerk claim that’s a common misconception. “We don’t confront with reality and we do not play-act that we believe something that is not true,” de Klerk says. “We explore the meaning of what is said or the behavior that is expressing a need or feeling. We go to a deeper level than the facts that are expressed.”

It certainly seems to be catching hold, which isn’t a surprise given the burgeoning number of older people experiencing some form dementia. There are around 300 certified Validation teachers around the world who hold meetings each year to discuss and exchange experiences. It doesn’t appear to be a static discipline by any means. “It is through these collective discussions of professionals that we adjust, change, and further develop both the practice and theory of Validation,” says de Klerk.

For these two pioneers, the long-term goals of Validation include:

–Prevention of withdrawal inward
–Decreased anxiety or anger
–Increased social behaviors
–Decreased use of chemical and physical restraints
–Help for families trying to communicate with their relative, which perhaps enables the person to remain at home longer

For those struggling to manage a parent’s (or loved one’s) dementia using the precepts of Validation techniques, Feil and de Klerk offer three concrete tips:

Understand the person’s needs clearly

Often caregivers mistakenly project their own needs and feelings onto the loved one. “The son may want his mother to sit in the chair and stop trying to ‘go home,’” says de Klerk. “The mother’s need may be to feel like a good mother and take care of her children when they come home from school.”

Make eye contact and choose a comfortable distance

How you say something is as important as what you say. Eye contact and physical positioning count. “Get in front of that person and not on the side or behind,” says de Klerk. “Bend so that you are at eye level (not from above) and get close so the person feels your presence, but not too close — find the distance that is comfortable for the older person.”

Center yourself before you attempt Validation

One of the hardest aspects of communicating with someone in the throes of dementia is to avoid quick reactions. “Put aside your thoughts and feelings for the few minutes you want to communicate on a deep level,” says de Klerk. “Be open without judgment and simply take in what you see, hear, and feel. Then explore the meaning behind the behavior.”

Once you’re well into the practice and want to gauge its success for yourself, consider these questions:
Is there communication on some level?
Have I built trust with the person?
Do I have an empathetic relationship with person, so that he or she feels motivated to express emotions and unexpressed needs?
At the end of a session, does the person have a greater sense of self-worth? Has the person expressed what’s on his/her mind, and does he/she feel relieved? Is there less stress?

Dave Singleton is an award-winning writer and an author for www.Caring.com. If your loved one has memory impairment, you might also like How to Know When Someone With Alzheimer’s Needs Assisted Living.

 

Training teens who dropped out

By Rosa Ramirez
California Health Report

Several weeks after her 15th birthday, Alicia Flores simply stopped showing up to school. As a child, she dreamed of becoming a veterinarian or working in a day care center. But those dreams began to gradually erode. Teenage rebellion, peer pressure and her parent’s divorce began to occupy her mind.

Her entire ninth grade was a struggle. She couldn’t pay attention in school. She began missing classes. “I was doing bad in school,” she says.

By the time Flores was in the tenth grade at Junipero Serra High School in Tierrasanta, many of her friends were already spending more time hanging out in the park or at friends’ homes instead of the classrooms. It wasn’t long before she did the same.

“I was just not interested in school at all,” she says. “I didn’t think it was going to take me anywhere.”

Far from her home in Paradise Hill, a neighborhood in southeast San Diego, policy makers, academics and educators deliberate on ways to help the thousands of young people in California who like Flores, at one point, are neither in school nor work. Young people who miss out on early work experience are more likely to face unemployment in adulthood and are less likely to achieve higher levels of career success. Such missed opportunities invariably impacts their quality of life and health.

Deemed ‘disconnected,’ these youngsters are entering adulthood without formal education, work experience or social skills to compete in a changing work environment.

Nationally, more than 5.8 million–or one in seven– young people between the ages of 16 and 24 are neither in school nor in the workforce, a recent report titled “One in Seven: Ranking Youth Disconnection in the 25 Largest Metro Areas” found. The rates among disconnected black, Hispanic and lower-income youths are consistently and disproportionately high.

At 29 percent, blacks between the ages of 20 to 24 have the highest rates of disconnection than any other group, according to a December Annie E. Casey Foundation and Children Now study “Youth and Work: Restoring Teen and Young Adult Connections to Opportunity.”

In California, the number of disconnected youths has been on the rise.

More than 850,000 teens and young adults–roughly 18 percent–between the ages of 16 and 24 are disconnected, according to the Dec. 3 report. The state’s figures are higher than the national average (17 percent) and 35 percent higher since 2000. The report also found youth employment is at it’s lowest since World War II, with California ranking near the bottom.

Some observers say the problem can be traced to the nation’s changing work environment–one in which youths face stiffer competition for limited jobs. As an older generation delays retirement, fewer spots are freeing up for entry-level workers to move up, leaving college and high-school graduates to compete with experienced laborers for positions previously filled by workers with little or no work-history.

“More young people are taking part-time jobs just to pay the bills. Some are taking unpaid internships so they can have the experience. And many more are doing volunteer work to keep their resumes fresh,” says Terence Grado, director of national and state policy at Generation Opportunity.

Least-qualified workers, who generally tend to be those without education or work-experience, hurt the most.
“I felt it was hard for me to find a job because I didn’t have a high school diploma,” Flores tells the California Health Report.

She handed in dozens of résumés in person and submitted job applications online. She applied in grocery stores, family restaurants and fast-food chains. When a chain sandwich restaurant hired her but she never got any hours, Flores decided to join the Urban Corps of San Diego, a conservation corps and charter school that helps young people obtain a high school diploma and gain job skills.

“I had no way to pay for the things I wanted. No money for the bus,” Flores recalls. “I tried looking for work but did not have nice clothes to wear to the interview. I felt like I wasn’t the kind of person they wanted to employ.”

Being disconnected goes beyond not having spending cash. Research shows that joblessness as youths result in lower wages for years to come due to foregone work experience and missed opportunities to develop professional skills.

Disconnection can stunt their personal growth and hurts their self-esteem, stresses Kristen Lewis, co-author of the One in Seven report. “This is the time when you are deciding who you are. You are gaining educational credentials, you are building your networks–your very identity,” she says.

Myrna Contreras, director of student services with Urban Corps of San Diego, understands such hurdles. Many young people come to the Corps with limited or no work experience. Some arrive with the belief that “I’m not good enough. I don’t have good skills to compete in the workforce,” she says.

She says the program teaches them about personal responsibility—military style. Boys must shave daily and have their hair two inches from the scalp. Participants must tuck in their shirts. Punctuality is important. Being one minute late can get them sent home, Contreras says. They earn their high school diploma and get paid for cleaning streets, planting trees and removing graffiti.

About 36 percent are immigrants and refugees, with the rest being San Diegans; some 24 percent are women. “From the moment they walk into the door, we have expectations,” Contreras says.

Stephen Alcaraz, 21, of San Diego, said he wanted to help his single mother financially but didn’t have the credentials or confidence to find employment since dropping out of high school. He joined Urban Corps when a friend told him about the program.

Since joining the program, Alcaraz has learned about his talents and learned how to set and meet career goals.

“I’m good at math and formulas and problem-solving,” Alcaraz, who recently received a scholarship to pay his classes at a local community college, says proudly. He plans to transfer to a four-year university to study to become a civil engineer.

As for Flores, she has also noticed many transformations in herself since joining the program. She can talk to adults and groups. She can shake people’s hands and look them in the eyes. “I’ve learned a lot of skills,” she says. “I see a future.”

 

On autism, state won’t follow its own edict

By Daniel Weintraub

When the state decided to transition low-income kids from state-subsidized private insurance — known as Healthy Families –to the state-run Medi-Cal program, families of children with autism were promised that their kids’ treatment would not suffer. But those families soon learned that one especially promising (but expensive) form of treatment was not going to be covered by Medi-Cal.

Since then, those families and other supporters of autism treatment have been lobbying the Legislature to require Medi-Cal to cover the treatment, known as Applied Behavior Analysis. State senators added $50 million to the proposed budget to pay for the treatment for the coming year. But the latest version of the budget approved by budget-writing conference committee deleted that money.

The cut was especially hard to take because state regulators and the Legislature had already required private insurance companies to cover the therapy as part of their mental health benefits. So the state won’t do what it says the private sector must do.

“Particularly at a time when the state’s fiscal outlook is improving, it is unjust to pass a budget that continues to deprive children of medically necessary care and causes serious harm to children with autism and their families,” Jamila Iris Edwards, Northern California Director of Children’s Defense Fund-California, said in a statement e-mailed to reporters. “The State has broken its promise that no child would lose access to critical health care in the Healthy Families transition.”

Kristin Jacobson, President and Co-Founder of Autism Deserves Equal Coverage, noted that the state, in emergency regulations adopted last year, cited “imminent, serious, and irreparable harm to the public” if the services were not available to children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

” Less than a year later, how can the Administration allow these children and others in Medi-Cal to be exposed to the same irreparable harm?” she asked.

Some children will be able to receive the ABA therapy through regional centers for the developmentally disabled. But advocates say slots in those programs are limited and many children will not be able to get the services they need.

 

Latin American doctors fill U.S. physician shortages

By Rosa Ramirez
California Health Report

Dr. Ana Solis, who was born in rural Mexico, felt helpless when her mother was bedridden during a high-risk pregnancy. Seeing her mother’s agony prompted her to pursue a career in medicine.

“With all my soul, I wanted to alleviate that pain,” she recalls. In 2004, she earned her medical degree from the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Dr. Solis, who has since relocated to California and become a legal permanent resident, now seeks to improve healthcare of U.S. military men and women.

Shortly after obtaining her green card, she says, she visited military recruiting offices and signed for 20 years of service in the U.S. Navy. Dr. Solis has been assigned with a medical team to work with U.S. Marines. If they are deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, says the Navy officer, “We will be there. And I look forward to it.”

The University of California (Los Angeles) International Medical Graduate program, which aims to recruit doctors from Latin America like Dr. Solis, hopes to increase the number of Spanish-speaking physicians who have the cultural background to treat the growing Latino population at a time when the state is poised to face a doctor shortage.

Started in 2006, the program has at least 66 graduates, according to Dr. Michelle Bholat, who co-directs the program. Without any state funds, Dr. Bholat and others must raise funds to keep the program running.

The doctors hail from Mexico, Cuba, El Salvador, Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador. And their stories are as diverse as their backgrounds. One woman was born in Seoul and moved to Brazil with her family as a teenager. Fluent in English, Spanish, Portuguese and Korean, she was accepted into the program with advance standing. Another participant worked as a janitor and made tamales to earn money while learning English and studying for the U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations. And yet another is an officer with the U.S. Navy.

“Let’s challenge the traditional view of Latinas—count on me to show that Hispanic females can be doctors, and also wear uniforms and boots,” Dr. Solis likes to say.

Looming physician shortage

It’s estimated that only 30 percent of U.S. doctors practice primary care. The Association of American Medical Colleges projects the country will face a shortage of more than 90,000 physicians by 2020, a figure that’s expected to grow to 130,000 by 2015.

California’s dwindling supply of primary care physicians is poised to become even greater in rural areas, said Dr. Patrick Dowling, co-director of the program.

(RELATED: In rural California, physician shortages expected to increase.)

In Kern County, for instance, there are 1,200 patients for every primary care physician, nearly double the nation’s average, according to the California Medical Association. The uneven geographic distribution is part of the reason for the program, Dr. Dowling says.

The program helps the foreign doctors qualify for medical residencies by preparing them for the U.S. Medical Licensing Exam. It also offers them clinical observerships. The doctors then compete for competitive residency spots. Upon completing California’s three-year residency training, foreign doctors must commit to work in medically underserved areas for a minimum of two years.

“There’s where we can make the biggest difference,” says Juan M. Cabrales, who also obtained his medical degree in Tijuana. He will join the UCLA Family Medicine residency training this summer.

“I’m planning to stay in California,” the 33-year-old Mexican doctor says. “I feel that I can make a bigger difference here than in my country.”

Cultural competency

For years, health professionals have found direct links between cultural competencies and the elimination of racial and ethnic health disparities.

With the Affordable Care Act adding an estimated three million insured Californians into the system, including many who are limited English speakers, the need of doctors who understand how to communicate with them is expected to grow, says Dr. Bholat.

Representing 39 percent of the state’s population, Hispanics will become the dominant ethnic group in California by the end of the year, data released earlier this year by California Department of Finance has indicated.
One in every 10 persons is of Mexican origin yet Latinos account for only 4.5 percent of physicians in the state, Dr. Bholat says.

It’s only natural the program reached to California’s southern neighbor, says Dr. Dowling. Mexico has an oversupply of physicians. A 2005 study published in Human Resources for Health discovered that out of 1000 graduates, more than 30 percent could not find “remunerated positions in the labor market.”

“Why shouldn’t we have some of those physicians?” Dowling says.

Attracting foreign-born doctors is nothing new. Currently, more than one in four doctors, and one in eight nurses, were born outside the country. A June study by the Migration Policy Institute indicated that more than 25 percent of physicians and 27 percent of surgeons in 2010 were foreign born.

Most, however, are from places like Pakistan, China and India. Only about five percent of physicians and surgeons are from Latin America, according to the Institute.

What about creating an internal pipeline of U.S. doctors?

Dr. Dowling and Dr. Bholat have worked for the past three decades to increase diversity in the medical field, he says. “I’ve always been involved. But it’s a hard thing to resolve.”

For starters, the state’s Hispanics and African America continue to have lower-than-average high school graduation rates, although recent data show those figures are improving.

About 65.7 percent of African American students graduated with their class in 2012, up 2.9 percentage points from the year before, while 73.2 percent of Hispanics graduate, up 1.8 percentage points from the previous year, according to the state’s Education Department.

In addition, Hispanics nationally reached a milestone by surpassing whites in college enrollment, a recent Pew Hispanic Report shows. Some 69 percent Hispanic high school graduates in the graduating class of 2012 matriculated in college that fall, compared 67 percent of their white counterparts.

Despite those improvements, though, blacks and Hispanics continue to lag in bachelor-degree attainment.

And even as communities of color continue to make small gains in medical school enrollments, according to a recent Association of American Medical Colleges report, they remain severely underrepresented.

In the meantime, Mexican doctor April Arias, 35, will continue to fill the needs of patients with limited language skills. A resident at the Family Medicine Residency Program at University of California San Diego, Dr. Arias understands that Hispanics often gather around food, celebrations and family.

She tells them to prepare traditional foods with alternative ingredients to make them more healthily. Incidences of diabetes, she tells them, are high among Latinos. They are surprised when she’s familiar with foods like cactus.

What she finds equally rewarding is being able to speak with them in their native tongue. It takes them a shorter time to convey their message, she says.

“I see the enthusiasm in their eyes,” Dr. Arias says. “You make a deeper connection with them. And when the [visit] is over, they’ll ask me for a hug.”

 
 
 

Home | Cal Health Report | Community Report | Legislation | Ideas | Forums | About Us

©2013 HealthyCal.org