Ideas | HealthyCal
 

Ideas

  

Dying behind bars

According to Jackson, he deserves to die behind bars. He thought his crime was justified at the time, he says, but his prison sentence left his six children without a father. Photo by Armand Emamdjomeh.

By Armand Emamdjomeh

With the tattoos that appear to cover every inch of his body, Terry Jackson cuts a terrifying figure. At least he would, 20 years ago, before his prison sentence, severe arthritis and AIDS wracked his body. Now the 41-year-old prisoner can barely walk, and seems most comfortable in his bed.

Though he may seem feeble now, Jackson is serving a 25-year-to-life sentence for first degree murder. Jackson is one of more than 2,800 inmates at the California Medical Facility, the only California prison facility with a licensed elderly-care unit and a hospice unit for terminally ill inmates.

The facility is emblematic of the dilemma facing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as longer sentences and three-strikes requirements lead to an aging prison population – many of whom are serving life sentences and likely to die behind bars. These inmates come at great cost to the state – prisoners’ medical bills can range as high as $2.5 million, according to a report by a federally appointed receiver who oversees the state’s prison health care.

Armand Emamdjomeh originally reported this story with Karen McIntyre and Isabella Cota Schwartz as part of the “Behind Bars” News 21 project at the Graduate School of Journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently a web developer and producer at the Los Angeles Times.

 

Will California face a doctor shortage?

With an aging population and more people gaining insurance coverage thanks to the federal health reform, California might face a shortage of primary care doctors to serve all those who need care. While the number of doctors in the state has kept pace with population in recent years, the number of graduates from California’s eight medical schools has remained relatively flat over the last 15 years, in spite of the 20 percent growth in population.

The University of California, which operates five of the programs, has announced plans to expand enrollment in existing programs in addition to opening two new medical schools.

See a report on the issue from the California Healthcare Foundation here.

 

LAO: cutting health, welfare spending

Health and social service spending represents nearly a third of the state’s general fund. But facing a $20 billion deficit, the Legislature’s hands are tied by federal mandates, court decisions and voter-approved measures. The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst examines the health and welfare budget and offers proposals for reducing it. See the report here.

 

The health costs of air pollution

smogCalifornians, their health insurers and the government spent nearly $200 million on hospital care for air-pollution-related admissions between 2005 and 2007 that could have been avoided if the state met federal clean air standards, according to a new study from the Rand Institute. Using hospital admissions data and air pollution records, the Rand researchers found an estimated 29,000 emergency room visits and hospital admissions that could have been prevented. Of the hospital visits considered preventable, about three-quarters were attributed to the presence of fine particulate matter in the air, known as PM 2.5. The rest were related to levels of ozone in the air. See the full study here.

Photo from flickr.com

 

More illness, less insurance

Women between the ages of 50 and 64 are more prone than younger women to a wide range of health conditions, including asthma, diabetes and heart disease, according to a new policy brief from the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Nearly four in 10 women in this age group will be diagnosed with high blood pressure, while nearly six in 10 are either obese or overweight. In both cases, the percentages are higher than for younger women. The research, based on the California Health Interview Survey, also found that the likelihood of having health insurance was related to a woman’s marital status. The study found that one-quarter of older women who had never married and 21 percent of divorced, separated or widowed women were uninsured — more than twice the rates of married women. See the study here.

 

Heart disease linked to pollution

A new study suggests that living close to busy freeways is related to your chance of getting heart disease. The study found a statistical correlation between exposure to diesel particulate matter — the exhaust from big trucks — and the thickening of plaque on the arteries, a pre-cursor of heart disease. The researchers concede, however, that their conclusions are weakened by a small sample size, and they report that the connection between the heart condition and exposure to pollution was greater among low-income people, suggesting that other factors, including diet or stress, could also be in play.

To see the full study, go here.

Photo by Daniel R. Blume
 

Prisons versus higher ed


The Legislative Analyst’s Office gives two thumbs down to the governor’s proposal for a constitutional amendment that would require the state to spend more on universities than prisons. Why? The office says legislators and the governor can switch spending priorities now if they have the will to do so, and it would be unwise to lock more spending formulas — and less flexibility — into the constitution. The chart above from the LAO is a look at the trend in spending on both programs.

 

2 million Californians could get insurance under House plan

About 2 million Californians who are without insurance now would be eligible for subsidized coverage under the plan being considered in the US House of Representatives, according to UC Berkeley researchers.

Research

The UC Berkeley Labor Center examines health care spending for the estimated two million Californians who would qualify for subsidies under the proposed insurance exchanges in the House and Senate health reform bills. The center concludes that, after accounting for premiums and average out of pocket costs, both bills would result in significant savings for low- and moderate-income families compared to costs in the current individual market. The House bill would result in lower spending than the Senate bill for the lowest-income individuals and families, especially those with high health care use.

To see the full report, click here.

 
 
 

Home | Cal Health Report | Community Report | Legislation | Ideas | Forums | About Us

©2012 HealthyCal.org