Greenhouse Gas | HealthyCal
 

Posts Tagged greenhouse gas

  

Law aims to encourage less driving

Photo from Atwater Village Newbie via Flickr.com.

By Daniel Weintraub

California is making early progress toward its goal of reducing the use of motor vehicles, but more creative and aggressive public policies will be necessary to get people to switch from driving to walking, biking and using public transit, according to a new report from the Public Policy Institute of California.

One of the best options, the report concludes, would be to increase the cost of driving by replacing or supplementing the gas tax with fees that charge motorists according to how far they drive on the state’s roadways. The fees might also reflect the type of road used, the time of day and the kind of vehicle driven.

The report looks at the early implementation of a new law known as SB 375, which seeks to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases believed to be responsible for global warming. The bill encourages local governments and regional transportation planners to adopt policies that make it easier for Californians to live, work and play without using a car. The California Air Resources Board, which is implementing the law, hopes to reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled per person by 7 percent by 2020 and at least 13 percent by 2035.

The authors noted several areas where progress is visible: transit ridership is increasing, local officials recognize the importance of integrating land use policies with transit, road-pricing policies and parking, and local government are adopting policies to support the goals of SB 375.

But hurdles remain.

The biggest, perhaps, is that the state and local governments have been encouraging the development of housing near transit stations when it is jobs and transit that need to be closer to one another. If people don’t live near a transit station they can still drive or bike to one and take a train to work. But if the train lets them off far from work, it can be difficult to get to their job on the other end.

Rail ridership has increased only from .9 percent of all commute trips in 1990 to 1.4 percent in 2008, a far slower rate of increase than fare hikes and service expansions. Employment density — the number of jobs per square mile — is low and declining as employers move from central cities to roomy campuses in the suburbs. The report suggests relaxing requirements on parking spaces at new job centers and expanding the use of feeder buses to give commuters more options once they get off a train.

The report’s authors also note that while reducing vehicle miles traveled will be difficult and yield only a small portion of the reduced emissions the state is hoping for from all sources, the same policies will also provide broader public health benefits by encouraging people to walk and bike rather than drive.

To see the full report, go here.

.

 

ARB staff moves forward with SB 375 goals

By Daniel Weintraub

The Air Resources Board took another step today toward its implementation of a state law meant to encourage local governments to adopt planning and transportation policies that cut automobile use and lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

The ARB released a staff recommendation that will likely lead to goals for regions around the state to reduce their per capita emissions of the gases believed to contribute to global warming.

The targets — which are the result of legislation known as SB 375 — are supposed to result in more support for transit, denser development, toll roads where the rates vary with the level of congestion, and traffic management policies designed to keep freeways and other major roads flowing smoothly.

The staff recommendation is largely similar to a draft recommendation released earlier this summer, and it builds upon decisions already being made at the local level. It will be considered by the full ARB at its Sept. 23 meeting.

In the state’s four largest metropolitan areas, the recommendations call for greenhouse gas reductions of 7 to 8 percent per capital below 2005 levels by 2010. By 2035, the targets would range from a 13 percent reduction Los Angeles and San Diego to 15 percent in the Bay Area and 16 percent in Sacramento.

The staff report also included policy scenarios for each region that gave a crystal-ball look at what kind of changes might be necessary to achieve the emission goals.

In Sacramento, for example, the scenario assumes that 68 percent of new housing will be compact, compared to 60 percent in current land use plans. Growth is focused in the urban core and existing suburban centers, and a higher proportion of the development is served by transit.

The result: a 14 percent reduction in vehicle trips per capital, a 60 percent increase in the use of transit and a 21 percent jump in the walking and biking.

To see the full staff report, go here.

 

ARB moves to limit greenhouse gas from development, transportation

By Daniel Weintraub

The California Air Resources Board is taking the first steps to implement a new state law that will eventually require local governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by better coordinating land-use planning, development and transportation.

The board is considering targets for each region that would require the four largest metropolitan areas in the state to reduce their per-capita emissions in 2020 to 5 percent to 10 percent below the levels that existed in 2005.

By 2035, those same areas — Los Angeles and Orange County, San Diego, the Bay Area and Sacramento — would have to reduce emissions related to transportation by as much as 19 percent per capita below 2005 levels.

The targets, which the board expects to finalize in September, will force regional planning boards in those areas to coordinate road construction and transit with development in a way that minimizes vehicle traffic. Generally that will mean more transit and car pool lanes, more infill development on vacant or underused lots in urban areas, and denser suburban development in communities where it will be possible to walk or bike to work, stores and schools.

The targets are the result of SB 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008. SB 375 is the lesser known but still important sibling to AB 32, the state’s landmark greenhouse gas reduction law. AB 32 will be challenged in a November ballot measure that calls for its suspension until unemployment is reduced to 5.5 percent for four consecutive quarters.

But even if AB 32 is suspended, SB 375 will live on, and it will soon be affecting how cities and counties plan and approve new development and transportation projects.

The ARB is holding a series of workshops this summer for the public to comment on its draft regional targets.

For a list of the workshop dates, go here.

For the ARB staff report on the draft greenhouse gas reduction targets, go here.

 

Public Health Institute to study effects of global warming law

The Oakland-based Public Health Institute has been awarded a $150,000 grant to study the potential effects of California’s cap-and-trade greenhouse gas reduction program on low-income communities.

The institute will be working with the state Public Health Department on the study, which will then be used by the Air Resources Board as it implements Assembly Bill 32, the landmark legislation that requires California to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

The law requires the ARB to determine if its policies have the potential to result in any unintended consequences for low-income communities and to examine policy options to enhance and protect public health. At the time AB 32 was being debated in the Legislature, some residents and advocates said they feared a cap-and-trade system would encourage heavy industry to continue to pollute in and near low-income neighborhoods because firms will be able to buy “offsets” that let them take credit for emission reductions accomplished elsewhere.

The grant to the Public Health Institute is the first from the Health Impact Project, a recently launched collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts. The project will fund up to 15 demonstration projects in its first phase this year.

 

LAO: AB 32 would cost California jobs

Power plants like this one in Morro Bay would be affected by implementation of AB 32, which mandates cuts in carbon emissions.

California’s legislative analyst has opined that the implementation of AB 32, the state law to limit carbon emissions, would cost California jobs, at least in the short term. The conclusion, which came in response to a request from state Sen. Dave Cogdill, contradicts the stand of the Air Resources Board. Cogdill is calling for the law’s suspension. See the LAO letter to Cogdill here.

Power plant photo by Mike Baird.

 
 
 

Home | Cal Health Report | Community Report | Legislation | Ideas | Forums | About Us

©2013 HealthyCal.org