Obesity | HealthyCal - Part 2
 

Posts Tagged obesity

  

Hospitals pressured to back more breastfeeding

By Daniel Weintraub

California advocates for women and children are making a major push for breastfeeding and laying the groundwork for proposals in the Legislature that could require hospitals that deliver babies to reduce the number of newborns fed with bottled formula.

The campaign is coming from an association that represents the Women, Infants and Children program (WIC), which provides nutrition for low-income families and is the largest purchaser of baby formula in the state.

Registered Nurse Barb Hanson meets with new mother Phana Yon, 28, in the drop-in Lactation Center at Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center. Yon, who gave birth to her son three days ago, walked into the clinic to ask questions about breastfeeding. Photo from Kaiser Permanente.

Studies have shown that breastfeeding helps prevent a number of diseases and conditions, including childhood obesity. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that 15
percent to 20 percent of obesity could be prevented through breastfeeding.

“It can’t cure everything, but it can help prevent a lot of acute and chronic disease,” said Karen Farley, a program manager for the association.

Bottle feeding is thought to contribute to obesity for several reasons.

Breastfeeding and formula are believed to have different effects on metabolism and hormones, including insulin, which helps regulate how much fat the body stores.

Breastfed babies also may be better at regulating their food intake. Mothers who cannot see how much milk their babies are getting are more likely to rely on the infant to signal when he or she is full, rather than feeding them a bottle until all the formula is gone.

“It’s kind of like cleaning your plate when you are already full,” Farley said. “Breastfed babies stop when they are no longer hungry.”

Citing data that show a wide disparity among hospitals in the number of women who feed their infants exclusively breast milk before taking their children home, the association asserts that much of that difference is due to practices that could be and should be changed.

The WIC program is trying to lead the way by giving new mothers incentives to breast feed, including extra food in a breastfeeding mom’s food package and breast pumps so that mothers who return to work can still feed their babies.

Baby Friendly Policies
Hospitals must follow these ten policies in order to be certified as “Baby Friendly.”
1. Maintain a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely
communicated to all health care staff.
2. Train all health care staff in skills necessary to implement
this policy.
3. Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and
management of breastfeeding.
4. Help mothers initiate breastfeeding within one hour of birth.
5. Show mothers how to breastfeed and how to maintain
lactation, even if they are separated from their infants.
6. Give infants no food or drink other than breast milk, unless
medically indicated.
7. Practice “rooming in” – allow mothers and infants to
remain together 24 hours a day.
8. Encourage unrestricted breastfeeding.
9. Give no pacifiers or artificial nipples to breastfeeding infants.
10. Foster the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and
refer mothers to them on discharge from the hospital or clinic.

The group is also pushing hospitals to adopt a collection of “Baby Friendly” guidelines developed by the World Health Organization. The policies require more training of hospital staff, education of pregnant women about the benefits of breastfeeding, helping mothers initiate feeding within an hour of birth, and giving infants no food or drink other than breast milk unless medically indicated.

Hospitals must also agree not to accept free or discounted formula from the manufacturers – a perk that advocates of breastfeeding believe makes hospitals more likely to use formula.

Sheree Kruckenberg, vice president of the California Hospital Association, said her members support breastfeeding but do not necessarily want to follow the “Baby Friendly” guidelines. Instead, she said, the association backs a separate set of model policies already recommended by the state.

“In order to qualify for the Baby Friendly status, there’s a lot of things that a hospital would have to do,” she said. “For some hospitals, they don’t do enough births to justify the expenditure.”

The bigger issue, Kruckenberg said, is that new mothers are usually in the hospital for less than 24 hours.

“The ability for a hospital to influence a mother’s decision is very short-lived,” she said. “Most mothers that come to us have predetermined whether they ae going to breast feed or not.”

That decision can be affected by cultural norms, socio-economic levels, a family’s support and whether or not a woman is going to return quickly to work.

“There are so many factors a mom takes into consideration,” she said. “We’re not able to influence their decisions.”

But many hospitals are trying. One is Kaiser Hospital in South Sacramento. Barb Hansen, a registered nurse there and assistant manager of health education, said the hospital started by adopting the model guidelines the state recommends and then found it easy to move on to the more involved Baby Friendly system.

That step required nurses to get 18 hours of training in how to help new mothers breast feed, and all staff, including doctors, had to have at least some training.

The hospital, which delivers about 200 babies a month, has large birthing rooms where mothers can keep their babies with them, and even mothers who have Caesarian sections typically have their babies with them within an hour. The hospital also discourages mothers from supplementing their milk with formula, which can distract a baby from nursing.

“The concept is that babies are born healthy and are wired to breast feed,” Hansen said. “They don’t need to be supplemented unless there is a medical indication.”

Hansen said some hospitals balk at giving up free formula from the manufacturers, but she believes it is wise to do so.

“You don’t have the formula reps coming into your hospital and offering education, free trips, free formula if the nurses have babies,” she said. “You remove that conflict of interest and that’s a huge hurdle if hospitals have to pay for that.”

Although Kruckenberg of the hospital association said cultural traditions often lead Hispanic women to prefer bottle-feeding, Hansen said those habits can be overcome with supportive hospital staff.

“Most Hispanic moms do breastfeed,” she said. “Understanding their beliefs and being supportive of their cultural beliefs helps.”

Statewide, records on the behavior of new mothers while still in the hospital show that 87 percent do some breastfeeding but only 43 percent breast feed exclusively. Among major counties, the rates for exclusive breast feeding range from a high of 76 percent in San Francisco to a low of 24 percent in Los Angeles County. At Kaiser in South Sacramento, the most recent numbers from the state, from 2007, show that 90 percent of new mothers breastfeed and 71 percent do so exclusively. Those numbers are likely higher today.

Laurie True, executive director of the WIC Association, said the group will probably push soon for legislation requiring any hospital that is reimbursed by Medi-Cal for delivering babies to follow the Baby Friendly guidelines.

“Breast feeding is a learned skill,” she said. “It’s not easy. It needs a lot of support. It needs to be built into the health care system.”

 

Santa Clara to restrict linking of toys, unhealthy food

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors has given tentative approval to an ordinance that would restrict the ability of restaurants to use toys or other incentives to entice children into eating meals that are high in fat, sugar, and calories. The ordinance is believed to be the first of its kind in the United States.

According to county Supervisor Ken Yeager, who sponsored the ordinance, the Federal Trade Commission estimated that in 2006, restaurants sold 1.2 billion meals accompanied by toys to children under 12. A 2008 study by the Center for Since in the Public Interest found that 10 out of 12 meals exceeding the recommended number of calories for children came with toys, according to Yeager.

“This ordinance levels the playing field,” Yeager said. “It helps parents make the choices they want for their children without toys and other freebies luring them toward food that fails to meet basic nutritional standards.”

The ordinance, which would apply only in the unincorporated areas of the county, would allow restaurants to offer toys and other incentives as long as the food they come with meets national nutritional criteria for children.

Food would be considered unhealthy if it had more than 120 calories for a beverage, 200 for a single food item or 485 for a meal) excessive sodium (480 mg for a single food item or 600 mg for a meal), excessive fat (more than 35 percent of total calories from fat), or excessive sugar (more than 10 percent of calories from added sweeteners.) The criteria are based on standards for children’s health created by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) and recommendations for children’s food published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

The ordinance will not go into effect until the board of supervisors gives it final approval, scheduled for a May 11 meeting.

 

Majority of voters back soda tax to fight obesity

A majority of Californians would support a “small” tax on sweetened soda as a way to fight obesity, according to a Field Poll survey sponsored by a public health advocacy group.

The poll found that 56 percent would support such a tax, with 43 percent opposed. The margin of error in the survey of 503 registered voters was 4.5 percent in either direction.

The survey found support highest for a tax in Los Angeles (61 percent in favor) and the Bay Area, where support was 60 percent. In San Diego, Orange and other Southern California counties, support was at 54 percent.

The only region of the state where less than a majority supported the tax was the Central Valley, where only 43 percent said they were in favor of it. The Central Valley is also the region with the highest rates of soda consumption in California, according to earlier studies.

Although low-income people tend to drink more soda and are more at risk for obesity, 60 percent of voters in families making less than $40,000 per year said they would support it. Among Latinos, another high-risk group, support was at 66 percent.

“Californians are deeply concerned about the health of children and are ready to take concrete steps to halt the obesity crisis in our state,” Harold Goldstein, director of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, which commissioned the poll, said in a statement. “They not only have specific ideas of what will make a difference, but are ready to support legislation to make that happen.”

The center is the sponsor of Senate Bill 1210, by Sen. Dean Florez, which would add a tax of one penny per teaspoon of added sugar or high fructose corn syrup in soda. The tax would add an estimated ten cents to the cost of a can of soda and would raise $1.5 billion for childhood obesity prevention programs.

A study last year by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research found that 41 percent of children, 62 percent of adolescents and 24 percent of adults drink at least one soda or other sugar-sweetened beverage every day. Regardless of income or ethnicity, adults who drink one or more sodas or other sugar-sweetened beverages every day are 27 percent more likely to be overweight or obese, according to the researchers.

Still, the poll released Tuesday found that Californians, as they are on so many issues, are more supportive of increasing funding to fight obesity than they are in raising a tax to finance that spending.

The survey found that 84 percent support providing healthier food in public schools, 84 percent backed providing more active physical education programs, 82 percent support ensuring all schools have clean drinking water, and 74 percent support subsidizing health insurance for children whose families cannot afford it. Sixty-four percent support improving local parks and building more bike and walking paths.

 

Senate Health Committee passes ban on sport drinks in schools

The Senate Health Committee has approved legislation that would ban the sale of sugar-sweetened sport drinks at California public schools during school hours.

California banned the sale of soda in the schools in 2004. But that law did not apply to sugar-sweetened sport drinks.

“We need to close this loophole and make state law consistent,” Senator Alex Padilla, the author of the bill, said in a statement.

According to Padilla, 8 of the 10 most popular beverages sold in high schools are sports drinks. The sale of sugar-sweetened sports drinks is already banned in elementary and middle schools.

Senate Bill 1255 is part of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s anti-obesity package. It was approved on a 6-3 vote and moved to the Senate Education Committee.

 

Modest soda taxes don’t affect consumption or weight gain

Modest additional taxes on sweetened soft drinks don’t do much to curb consumption or child obesity, according to a study released today. But more significant levies targeting soda might have more impact.

The study, published in the journal Health Affairs, could find no significant connection between soda consumption or weight gain among children and special taxes on soda. The taxes in the study averaged 3.5 percent, and none were larger than 7 percent.

This image is from an anti-soda marketing campaign sponsored by the city of New York.

“If the goal is to noticeably reduce soda consumption among children, then it would have to be a very substantial tax” said Roland Sturm, the study’s lead author and a senior economist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization. “A small sales tax on soda does not appear to lead to a noticeable drop in consumption, led alone reduction in obesity.”

New soda taxes have been proposed in California and elsewhere. Democrats in Congress considered the idea as a way to finance an expansion of health insurance for the poor but dropped the proposal in the face of opposition from the beverage industry.

In California, Senate Bill 1210 would slap a tax of 1 cent for every added teaspoon of sugar in sweetened drinks. A 12-ounce can of soda has about 10 teaspoons of sugar. A ten-cent tax on that can would be as much as 25 percent, even at a discount grocery store.

In the study, researchers estimated the potential effect of taxes by looking at the differences in existing sales taxes among the states and then comparing those levels to information about weight and soda consumption among 7,300 children.

Although children at higher risk for obesity — those who were heavier, children from low-income families, African-American children and those who watched a lot of television — drank more soda than children in general, they also were among those whose soda-drinking habits were most sensitive to higher taxes. The impact was greatest for children from these groups who could buy soda at school.

The most effective kind of soda tax, the researchers said, would be an excise tax that would increase the price of soda on the grocery store shelf. Sales taxes collected at the cash register have less effect because consumers don’t connect the tax to the particular product.

An 18 percent soda tax proposed and then dropped from New York’s Executive Budget last year could help prevent excessive weight gain between third and fifth grades by 20 percent, the researchers said.

–Daniel Weintraub

 

Kaiser study: extreme obesity among kids is on the rise

This graph from Kaiser Permanente shows the normal, obese and extremely obese weights for boys of average height at different ages.

Extreme obesity is affecting more children than ever, according to a massive new study of children’s health records from Southern California.

The study, published today in the Journal of Pediatrics, examined electronic health records for more than 700,000 children and teens ages 2 to 19 in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health plan for 2007 and 2008.

The research found that 7.3 percent of boys and 5.5 percent of girls were extremely obese, using a definition published in 2009 by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

Among children of color the numbers were even more alarming: 12 percent of black teen-age girls and 11.2 percent of Hispanic teen-age boys were found to be extremely obese.

If the numbers from Southern California reflect the state as a whole, more than a half million children in California would be classified as extremely obese.

“Without major lifestyle changes, these kids face a 10 to 20 years shorter life span and will develop health problems in their twenties that we typically see in 40 -60 year-olds,” said Corinna Koebnick, a Kaiser research scientist who led the study.

Children who are extremely obese, she said, are at higher risk for heart disease, type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease and joint problems, among other ailments.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, extreme obesity is defined as 1.2 times the 95th percentile, or a body mass index of more than 35 kilograms per meter-squared.

What’s that mean in layman’s terms?

A 15-year-old boy of average height would have a normal weight of about 129 pounds. An obese boy of that height and age would weigh 186 pounds. An extremely obese boy would weigh 231 pounds.

–Daniel Weintraub

For more on this study see Kaiser’s web site at www.kp.org

To calculate your child’s body mass index, go here.

The full study is available by subscription only at the Journal of Pediatrics.

 

Governor proposes anti-obesity agenda

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is proposing to remove sport drinks like these from California's public schools. This brand has about 150 calories and 42 grams of sugar per bottle.

Updated at 2:19 pm.

LOS ANGELES–Describing childhood obesity as a “huge problem” afflicting California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger today proposed new measures to force local schools to provide fresh water, ban sugar-sweetened sports drinks and ensure that kids exercise during physical education classes and after-school programs.

Schwarzenegger also said he wants to encourage schools to keep their playing fields open after hours and on weekends and make it easier for low-income communities to receive grants to improve walking and biking routes to school.

“Obesity is a huge problem for the state of California,” Schwarzenegger said at a policy summit in Los Angeles with former President Bill Clinton.

Schwarzenegger said one-third of California teens and three out of five adults are either overweight or obese. Those numbers, he said, have been building for decades and are going to be difficult to turn around. But he said that concerted action by parents, schools, government and the private sector could have an impact.

“There is no silver bullet,” he said. “There is no magic. It cannot be done overnight.”

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and former President Bill Clinton discuss obesity at a policy summit in Los Angeles. Photo from Peter Grigsby, office of the governor.

Clinton said he committed his private foundation to focus on nutrition and obesity after he had heart surgery in 2004. He said obesity-related problems, including heart disease and diabetes, account for $150 billion in spending in the Medicaid program alone, which provides health care to the poor. But he also said the problem is taking a human toll.

“We’re running the risk of having the first generation of kids live shorter lives than their parents,” Clinton said. “Until we get a hold of our lifestyles and the food chain and how we eat and exercise, we are going to have serious problems.”

Both men said parents have to do more to provide healthy foods for their children and encourage them to exercise. But they also noted that, especially in low-income neighborhoods, that can be difficult. Often, no fresh fruits or vegetables are available at nearby stores, and places for kids to play are few and far between.

Clinton offered a vague mea culpa for being part of the movement to subsidize the corn industry, a policy that has been blamed for making high-fructose corn syrup cheaper and thus more widely used in sweetened foods and beverages. Noting his own health problems, he said he has been perhaps both a “victim” and “complicit” in the problem. But he encouraged Californians to send an economic message to the food industry by refusing to buy unhealthy products.

“We need to create a movement in America to push back up the food chain so we stop subsidizing food production that is harmful to our country,” he said.

Schwarzenegger noted that he had already signed legislation to ban soda and junk food from school vending machines and require nutrition labeling on restaurant menus. But he said sweetened sport drinks were sneaking through a “loophole” in the vending machine law that needs to be closed, and he endorsed legislation requiring schools to provide fresh water with meals that they serve to students by 2012. The governor also wants physical education classes to spend at least half their time in moderate or vigorous physical activity, and after school programs to include at least 30 minutes of exercise.

The summit featured testimonials from school administrators, teachers and others who have been on the forefront of anti-obesity policies.

Jennifer LeBarre, director of nutrition for the Oakland schools, said her district has already banned sweetened sport drinks. Ken Dyar, coordinator of physical education for the Delano Unified School District, described that district’s commitment to transforming the fitness culture of its largely low-income student body. Robert Ogilvie, director of the Planning for Healthy Places program, said communities across the state are beginning to look at ways to make it easier for parents and children to eat well and exercise.

“Right now in too many neighborhoods, the healthy choice is the hard choice,” he said.

Clinton echoed that sentiment, saying that many parents feel “overwhelmed by the circumstances of their lives” and need help from government and community organizations to change their ways. But he also said the essence of the problem is not complicated.

“There is still a simple equation,” Clinton said. “In the end it’s calories in, calories out. We ingest too much and exert too little.”

–Daniel Weintraub

Note: Schwarzenegger’s event today was hosted by the California Endowment; the Endowment is also the initial funder of this web site, www.healthycal.org.

 

Florez proposes soda tax to fund obesity prevention programs

UPDATED at 4:27 pm.

California Senate Majority Leader Dean Florez (D-Shafter) has introduced legislation to tax sodas and other sugar-sweetened beverages to fund childhood obesity programs.

The bill would levy a penny tax for every teaspoon of added sugar in commercial beverages sold. Florez estimates that the excise tax on beverage distributors would raise $1.5 billion annually. The money would go to California cities and schools to pay for childhood obesity prevention programs.

“I don’t want obesity to be the legacy that we leave to our children,” Sen. Florez said at a press conference. “With the revenues raised from this bill, we can support schools and build communities where children are active, eating healthier foods and putting the threat of obesity and related diseases like diabetes behind them.”

Florez said he was prompted the introduce the bill by what he called a “growing body of research’ highlighting the central role of soda and other sugar-sweetened beverages in promoting obesity.

Skeptics have said the connection between soda and obesity has not been proven despite a number of studies testing that hypothesis. But research released last year by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research found that adults in California who drank a soda or more a day are 27 percent more likely to be overweight or obese. Californians consume 50 gallons of soda a year containing the equivalent of 39 pounds of sugar.

“If we’re going to make any headway in addressing the obesity epidemic, we have to start with the biggest culprit, and that’s clearly soda,” said Dr. Harold Goldstein, director of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, said in a written statement. “Soda is the one specific product for which we have overwhelming evidence of its direct link to obesity.”

Goldstein said it is expected that one-third of children born in 2000 will have diabetes sometime in their lives, including 50 percent for Latino and African American children.

Photo by Marlith.

 
 
 

Home | Cal Health Report | Community Report | Legislation | Ideas | Forums | About Us

©2013 HealthyCal.org