Tobacco | HealthyCal
 

Posts Tagged tobacco

  

Smoking rate hits record low

By Daniel Weintraub

California’s smoking rate dropped to a record low of 13.1 percent in 2009, according to new numbers from the state Department of Public Health. That’s a 42 percent decline since the state’s Tobacco Control Program was established in 1990.

Smoking continues to be correlated with education and income, according to the latest numbers.

Only about 5 percent of college graduates smoke, compared to rates between 12 percent and 15 percent for people with less than a college education.

People with incomes of 150,000 or more smoke at a rate of less than 8 percent. For people with incomes of less than 20,000, the rate is nearly 20 percent.

Men smoke more than women to do. About 16 percent of men and 11 percent of women in California smoke.

Other highlight from the report:

–Californians in rural areas generally smoke more than people in urban areas.

–Californians who smoke are smoking fewer cigarettes than in the past, and far fewer than the national average.

–Smoking rates have declined for all major ethnic groups.

Health and Welfare Secretary Kimberly Belshé said in a statement that she was proud of the “tremendous progress” California has made in the fight against smoking over the past 20 years. But she noted that nearly 4 million Californians still smoke and tobacco remains the number one cause of preventable death and disease in the state.

“Our job is not yet complete,” she said.

The Department of Public Health also released its latest version of anti-tobacco advertising paid for by a tobacco tax passed by voters in 1988.

Download the full report by clicking here.

 

Illegal tobacco sales to minors hit all-time low

By Daniel Weintraub

Illegal tobacco sales to minors in California reached an all-time low in the most recent survey of retailers by the California Department of Public Health.

Sales to customers under age 18 were completed in just 7.7 percent of 742 transactions attempted, the department said.

That’s down from 8.6 percent last year and 37 percent when the surveys began in 1995.

“The continued decline of illegal sales to minors is very encouraging,” Dr. Mark Horton, the state’s public health director, said in a statement. “Since 3 of 4 adult smokers started using tobacco before they were 18, we know it is critical to limit youth access to illegal sales both for the health of the child as well as their life long use of tobacco products.”

Discount and gift stores were the biggest offenders, with 22.6 percent found to be willing to sell tobacco to minors. Doughnut shops, which sold to minors at a rate of 21.6 percent last year, tightened up considerably, agreeing to sales in only 8.7 percent of cases this year.

Grocery stores, liquor stores, tobacco specialty stores and gas stations sold to minors at a rate of 6.8 percent.

Of 43 drug stores and pharmacies surveyed, none agreed to sell tobacco to a minor.

 

Smoking cessation benefits can save lives, money

By Tom Hopkins

Quitting smoking today is the number one thing that Californians can do to improve their health. Not a moment goes by without a citizen of our country and the State of California suffering from the hazards of tobacco use. Tobacco use has far reaching ramifications that encompass not only health issues, but widespread economic issues.

The difficulty that physicians, patients, and health care workers face today lies in the lack of accessible resources available to treat the ills of tobacco dependence.

Today, smoking is the number one preventable cause of death in the United States, and smoking-related illnesses are among the most dominant and preventable of all health issues. The U.S. Surgeon General cites tobacco as the single greatest cause of disease and premature death in America today. In California, there are nearly 5 million current adult smokers. Nationwide, more than 48 million Americans smoke, and 70 percent admit they want to quit. Even though seven in ten California smokers wants to quit, many smokers, particularly low-income Californians, lack the tools necessary to help them succeed.

As a practicing physician who specializes in treating chronic diseases including tobacco dependence and its health consequences, I continue to be frustrated by my inability to assist patients who lack coverage for medications and counseling services that would help treat their tobacco addiction.

We as a nation and a State can no longer afford to sit back and watch people die. The health of our children will be jeopardized by a well-known health hazard. If there is a smoking gun, it is our society that is holding it!

We can no longer afford to use an economic excuse for not covering the costs for smoking cessation treatments. The figures overwhelmingly demonstrate that coverage is a smart financial investment for governments, insurance companies and employers.

Nationwide, the total economic burden of smoking is at $193 billion. Indirect costs due to lost productivity from smoking-related illnesses in California total in the billions. The average cost for the package of covered smoking cessation services – including counseling and medication – is estimated at $487.50. In contrast, one smoker costs the Medicaid program in California an additional $1,951 per year over their lifetime. If only 10 percent of smokers quit, after five years, California Medicaid would save $59 million annually. If 50 percent of smokers quit, after five years, California Medicaid would save $296 million every year on smoking-related illnesses.

California now has an opportunity to take a stand against the hazardous health consequences of tobacco use and addiction. As we embark on Federal Health Reform implementation in California, it is time that we lend support to Californians who want to quit smoking.

Federal health reform was a good start, but under that plan, many insurers won’t have to cover smoking cessation treatments for years, or even a decade, and many patients who smoke will not even know they’ve gained coverage for the benefit.

If a Californian decides to quit smoking today, the best thing that we can do for his/her health and for the economy of California is to provide access to the full suite of CDC-recognized treatment options now, and to continue to cover different treatments and the doctor and patient try to find what works.

We know that quit-smoking programs are effective, but studies have also shown that it takes five to seven attempts to quit smoking. Many health plans currently cover only one attempt to quit per lifetime of a patient.

Federal health reform legislation requires that all new health insurance plans cover smoking cessation treatment with no cost sharing for American consumers.

California can improve on that piece of the federal reform. We can define what that benefit looks like for Californians, and we can make it available sooner, as opposed to years down the road. We can also make sure that all existing health plans cover access to proven treatment options recommended by the Centers for Disease Control.

If we do this, we will save lives, and money.

Dr. Tom Hopkins is the medical director for Employee Health and Chairman of the Utilization Management Team at Sutter Medical Center in Sacramento and former Medical Director for the Tobacco Cessation Program and Bariatric Program for Sutter Medical Center.

 

Anti-smoking law would save lives, money, study says

By Daniel Weintraub

A law to require insurance companies to cover smoking cessation services at no out-of-pocket cost to consumers would improve public health and the economy at a cost of less than $1 a month for each person covered by insurance, according to an independent analysis of the proposal.

The study was performed by the California Health Benefits Review Program, which since 2002 has analyzed the cost and potential benefit of legislative proposals to require insurance companies to provide certain services to their customers, known as “mandates.”

The anti-smoking bill, SB 220, by Sen. Leland Yee, would require insurers to offer telephone, group or individual counseling to smokers and all medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration to help smokers quit. This would include nicotine replacement therapy and prescription drug therapies, including gum, skin patches, inhalers, nasal sprays and other forms of treatment that counter the urge to smoke.

Counseling and medications could be limited to two courses per year. No co-payment, coinsurance, or deductible could be collected from the consumer.

Most of these benefits will be required as part of federal health reform, but those provisions of the federal bill will not take effect until 2014. SB 220 would take effect next year in California if it were passed and signed into law.

The study found that an additional 118,000 California smokers would get treatment in the first year as a result of the mandate. That treatment would cost, at most, about 67 cents per month for each person with insurance. The total cost of the treatment would be about $52 million in the first year.

That cost would probably be reduced by about $1 million from because about 10 fewer low-birth weight babies would be delivered and hospitalized, thanks to pregnant mothers who would quit smoking because of the new law.

But the savings over time could be much greater,. Tobacco use, the study points out, has “both direct and indirect costs that affect individuals, employers, health plans, the government and society.”

The study estimated that about 8,000 additional Californians would quit smoking each year, adding up to 100,000 years of potential life gained annuallyr because fewer people would die prematurely from the effects of smoking.

Smoking related productivity loss, projected to be about $8.5 billion in 2004, would also decline.

“Smoking cessation treatment is cost-effective,” the study said, and probably more cost-effective than other widely accepted medical treatments currently covered by insurance.

The cost of treating high-blood pressure, for example, ranges from between $5,000 to $45,000 per life-year gained, while smoking cessation treatment costs a few hundred to a few thousand dollars per life-year gained.

To see the entire report and other studies by the benefits review program, go here.

 

Senate passes bill to ban smoking in state parks, beaches

The state Senate has given final approval to legislation that would ban smoking at state beaches and in common areas of state parks.

The Senate passed the bill on a 21-13 vote and sent it to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has not said whether he would sign it.

The measure’s author, Sen. Jenny Oropeza, a Democrat from Long Beach, took several amendments weakening the bill along its legislative journey in order to get the votes she needed for passage.

The state Parks Department would enforce the ban, but could use only existing funds to do so. And the ban could not be enforced unless the department had first posted signs warning about the potential violations. The ban would apply on state beaches but not in camping areas next to them.

Citations for violating the ban would come with a maximum $100 fine.

The bill is supported by a number of California cities and the state firefighters union. It was opposed by the tobacco industry.

See the full text of Senate Bill 4 and staff analyses here.

 

Assembly passes ban on smoking at state beaches, parks

California’s Legislature is one step away from banning smoking at most state beaches and parts of the state’s 278 parks. The Assembly passed the ban on Monday and sent it to the state Senate, which is also expected to approve it. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has not said whether he will sign it into law.

The proposal, Senate Bill 4, would prohibit smoking at state beaches and parks, except at campsites and parking lots. It would impose a $100 fine, but that fine would be enforced after visitors were notified of the ban through signs posted in the area. No new state resources could be used to enforce the law.

The bill is sponsored by Sen. Jenny Oropeza, a Democrat who represents the coast of south Los Angeles County. It is supported by the cities of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan Beach and Torrance, plus a stwate firefighters association and the Sierra Club.

“Unfortunately, many beach visitors are irresponsible with their smoking habit,” Oropeza said in a statement. “Our majestic beaches and parks have been marred by cigarette butts for far too long.”

The proposal is believed to be the most far-reaching statewide ban on smoking in public recreation areas in the country.

Photo from Smart Destinations.

 

Senator proposes mandate for anti-tobacco drugs, classes

Sen. Leland Yee, the Democrat from San Francisco, has introduced legislation to require health plans and health insurers to provide tobacco cessation counseling and medication to their customers with little or no cost-sharing.

Yee argues that counseling and medication have proven to be “one of the most clinically effective and cost-effective” health services available, up to 80 times more effective than drugs prescribed (and paid for by insurance) to prevent heart attacks. He says that more than 70 percent of smokers wish they could quite and half try every year. But the success rate remains less than 5 percent. Access to counseling and medication, he contends, doubles that quit rate and has in some cases achieved rates as high as 25 to 30 percent. Access to these serves would save $4 for every $1 invested, Yee claims.

But these benefits are not necessarily cost effective for insurers because people change plans so often. One company might pay for the services but then see that customer go elsewhere, while customers who smoke and have not had the services come onto that firm’s role. For that reason, Yee says, a universal mandate makes sense.

The bill, SB 220, would require the plans and insurers to provide over-the-counter drugs with no co-pays. Prescription drugs and and tobacco counseling that would include up to two courses per year would come with a co-pay of no more than $15.

Health insurers and health plans generally argue that mandates such as these add to the cost of coverage for everyone, even when they require the plans to pay for cost-effective prevention measures.

See the full bill here.

Photo by wlodi.

 
 
 

Home | Cal Health Report | Community Report | Legislation | Ideas | Forums | About Us

©2013 HealthyCal.org